Agentic Web Part 2: The Evolution of Web Usage

Discover how the Agentic Web is transforming everyday internet use, from browsing and clicking to delegating tasks to AI agents. This evolution marks a shift where automation adapts to trust, stakes, and context, reshaping how we work, shop, learn, and connect online.

Discover how the Agentic Web is transforming everyday internet use, from browsing and clicking to delegating tasks to AI agents. This evolution marks a shift where automation adapts to trust, stakes, and context, reshaping how we work, shop, learn, and connect online.

In Part 1, we defined the Agentic Web: a shift from static pages to outcome-driven interactions powered by AI agents.

Here we dive into how core web use is transforming. Browsing gives way to delegation. The web stops being a place to click and becomes a system that acts.


Web 2.0 Core Use Cases


  • Stay informed:

    Manually visit news sites, RSS, newsletters, search for “what happened?”

  • Learn & research:

    Keyword search ➝ skim multiple sources ➝ bookmark or copy–paste notes

  • Communicate & build community:

    Email, chat apps, social media feeds, forums

  • Consume entertainment
    Stream video/music, play web games, scroll memes

  • Discover & buy
    Search + ad/social referrals ➝ compare offers ➝ fill checkout forms

  • Manage money
    Log in to online banking, trading dashboards, crypto wallets

  • Do work & create
    SaaS dashboards, cloud docs, CMS/blog editors

  • Book & coordinate services
    Flight portals, ride-hailing, food delivery, tele-health portals

  • Self-development & education
    MOOCs, language apps, digital training platforms


From One-Size-Fits-All to Adaptive Automation


In the early days of AI on the web, interaction was treated as a one-size-fits-all experience: enter a prompt, let the model run, accept the output. But this approach oversimplifies reality. Human behaviour isn’t uniform: it’s contextual, emotionally layered, and risk-sensitive.

Users calibrate trust in AI systems based on the stakes, emotional significance, and potential consequences of each action.


Why Maslow Still Matters in the Agentic Web


To design automation that feels trustworthy, we must align it with Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs:

  1. Physiological Needs – food, shelter, basic goods

  2. Safety Needs – health, financial stability, protection

  3. Belonging & Love – relationships, community, connection

  4. Esteem – status, achievement, personal value

  5. Self-Actualization – growth, creativity, purpose


The further up the pyramid a task falls, the more emotional weight, irreversibility, and regulatory impact it tends to carry. Consequently, the more nuanced and collaborative automation must become.


Trust Calibration: Matching Automation to Human Psychology


Factor

Low-Stakes Tasks

High-Stakes Tasks

Cost or Risk

$5 household item, news digest

Designer goods, healthcare, legal matters

Emotional Weight

“Refill dog food”

“Plan my wedding menu”

Reversibility

Easily undone (cancel, edit, re-order)

Difficult to unwind (legal filings, medical decisions)

Regulation

Light or none

Heavily regulated (finance, health, privacy, compliance)


Key Insight:

  • Basic-level tasks → full automation

  • Mid to upper-level tasks → consultative, agent-supported experiences


Autonomy Spectrum for Core Web Use Cases


As we examined not every task on the web requires - or deserves - the same level of oversight. Some can be fully delegated to agents, while others demand active human involvement. The Autonomy Spectrum illustrates how common web use cases divide across three modes of control: Agent-Led (full autonomy), Collaborative (partial autonomy), and User-Led (low autonomy).


Use Case

Agent-Led (Full Autonomy)

Collaborative (Partial Autonomy)

User-Led (Low Autonomy)

Stay Informed

Daily news digest, sentiment alerts

Curated deep-dive

Op-ed comparison

Learn & Research

Collect abstracts

Draft literature review

Final thesis

Communicate

Auto-sort inbox

Suggest talking points

Deliver bad news

E-Commerce

Restock consumables

Laptop shortlist

One-of-a-kind art

Finance

Pay utilities

Portfolio rebalance

High-risk investment

Travel & Logistics

Book commutes

Business trip planning

Honeymoon

Creative Work

Resize images

First-pass ad copy

Final brand voice

Security & Compliance

Patch vulnerabilities

Flag unusual logins

Regulatory reports


The Universal Agentic Workflow Framework


To operate effectively in an outcome-driven, agent-powered web, AI systems must follow a structured approach that mirrors how humans think, act, and adapt. The Universal Agentic Workflow Framework outlines the foundational stages every intelligent agent must execute to deliver reliable, human-aligned results.


#

Phase

What Really Happens

Why It Matters

Signs You’re Doing It Right

1

Intent (Query)

An agent extracts the goal the user cares about (“Book me a follow-up appointment with Dr Lewis next Wednesday at 10 a.m.”). Good agents clarify ambiguities (“Which Dr Lewis?”), detect constraints (insurance network, location), and capture desired outcomes (confirmation, reminder).

Precision up front prevents re-work later. Clear intent drives the entire chain; vague intent multiplies error downstream.

• Agent paraphrases the request in plain language for confirmation.


• Ambiguities are surfaced as questions, not assumptions.

2

Reasoning

The agent decomposes the goal into ordered sub-tasks, checks domain rules, and selects an approach. Example: “Follow-up appointment” → find provider calendar → insurance eligibility → secure-messaging API.

In regulated spaces—health, finance, legal—flawed reasoning equals liability. The agent must reconcile policy, best practices, and user context before acting.

• Decision tree is stored in a log or “show-your-work” view.


• Conflicts (e.g., double-booking) are resolved or flagged before proceeding.

3

Context Gathering

The agent pulls all needed data: user preferences (morning slots), stored credentials, current inventory (available slots), and compliance limits (HIPAA, GDPR). It may query other agents or databases.

Without comprehensive context, even perfect logic executes on bad inputs. Context turns an abstract plan into a tailored action.

• Data sources and timestamps are recorded.


• Sensitive data requests are minimal and justified (“need-to-know”).

4

Execution (Tool Calls)

The agent performs tasks via APIs, forms, or RPA: finds open slots, books appointment, updates calendar, sends confirmation. For simple jobs this is milliseconds; for complex chains it may span multiple systems.

Execution is where theory meets reality—latency, API limits, and edge-cases surface. Trust depends on reliably converting intent into a concrete result.

• Each call is atomic and reversible where possible.


• Errors trigger retries or rollbacks, not silent failure.

5

Reflection

Immediately after acting, the agent checks whether the outcome matches intent (Did the booking succeed? Is the date correct?). It compares state before vs. after and logs discrepancies for learning.

Reflexive self-check catches silent errors, reduces user escalation, and supplies training data for continuous improvement.

• Confirmation artifacts (booking IDs, timestamps) are validated.


• Mismatches trigger automated corrective steps or user alerts.

6

Human Audit

A human-in-the-loop reviews or approves actions when stakes warrant it: high-cost purchases, clinical decisions, legal filings. Audit depth scales with risk (read-only log for $20 buy; mandatory sign-off for surgery schedule).

Keeps ultimate control with the human, satisfying ethical, legal, and emotional requirements. It also builds user confidence in the agent.

• Clear hand-off: the agent pauses and notifies the user with concise context and options.


• Audit trail is immutable and easily exportable.

7

Iterative Feedback

Post-action feedback (explicit “Looks good” or implicit correction) is stored, scored, and used to adjust future reasoning and context gathering—tightening the personalization loop.

Continuous learning converts single successes into system-wide accuracy gains, compounding value over time.

• Feedback prompts are lightweight (“👍 / 👎”).


• Model updates are version-controlled and traceable.


Rule of Thumb:
Tighten human checkpoints as cost, irreversibility, or regulation increases.


Deep Dive: E-Commerce at Two Extremes


Household Staples (Toilet Paper)


  • Intent: “Buy the usual brand, cheapest price, deliver tomorrow.”

  • Agent Action:

    • Checks price/coupons

    • Verifies discounts

    • Executes payment

  • User Involvement:

    • Push notification: “Order placed: $11.20, arrives Tue.”


Why It Works: Low cost, reversible, no emotional weight.


Luxury Apparel (Designer Dress)


  • Intent: “Find a black cocktail dress, budget €800, deliver before July 10.”

  • Agent Action:

    • Curates options with return policies

    • Flags shipping estimates

  • User Involvement:

    • Reviews shortlist

    • Confirms preference and payment


Why Collaboration Matters: High cost, taste sensitivity, potential return hassle.


Behaviour Shift: From Browsing to Outcomes

We established that web usage is changing from the bottom up. The Agentic Web reframes the question from “Where should I click?” to “What should happen?”. Browsing is the core user behaviour of the current web that is shaken to the bone. Marketers and businesses have tried to take advantage of this "random walk" in order to influence web users. Since we are moving away from clicks to outcomes, a lot of this web activity diminishes. But not all of it. Let's examine.


Behaviours Likely to Fade


As agentic patterns spread, expect the following Web 2.x rituals to become obsolete or radically diminished:

Fading Task

Why It Disappears or Shrinks

Typing search queries and clicking through 10 blue links

Agents gather, rank, and synthesize facts; users receive direct answers or auto-performed actions.

Hand-comparing prices and coupon codes

Purchasing agents continuously benchmark and buy when target conditions are met.

Filling repetitive forms (checkout, booking, onboarding)

Agents transmit verified identity and payment tokens via secure APIs.

Daily email triage for routine items (updates, invoices, logistics)

Pattern-recognition agents auto-sort, draft replies, or resolve issues without surfacing them.

SEO-driven “listicle” content farms

Thin, low-value content stops attracting traffic as agents bypass it for more actionable, decision-ready information.

Banner and pre-roll advertising at scale

Agents filter out non-value ads; commerce shifts to intent-driven, API-level offers and revenue-sharing models.

Manual social cross-posting & scheduling

Content agents generate, localize, A/B-test, and auto-publish across platforms.

One-size-fits-all learning modules

Adaptive tutors replace static video series, offering personalized learning flows.

First-level customer support chat trees

Domain-specific agents resolve routine inquiries; human escalation occurs only for novelty, complexity, or emotion.


Why We’ll Still Load the Site


Even as automation replaces many low-stakes tasks, human users will continue to access traditional websites in key situations—especially when trust, experience, or regulation are involved. These are moments when browsing isn't a chore; it's an essential layer of assurance, discovery, or interaction.


Reason

Examples of When It Matters

Trust and liability

Users want to verify the source of medical advice, legal opinions, or investment guidance—seeking names, credentials, and disclaimers from a canonical web page.

Immersive or tactile shopping

Virtual try-ons, 3D product demos, and AR showrooms enhance decision-making for apparel, home goods, and cosmetics.

Community and story

Forums, comment sections, newsletters, and live events create social bonds and ongoing engagement that agents can’t replicate.

Complex interactivity

Tools like configurators, simulators, dashboards, and games still require responsive, real-time browser-based interfaces.

Identity and transactions

Secure checkouts, account management portals, and Know Your Customer (KYC) flows remain browser endpoints—especially when users must review or confirm details manually.

Emotional or milestone decisions

Experiences like planning a wedding, evaluating surgery outcomes, or choosing a school demand deep content, comparison, and visual immersion best delivered via the web.


Rule of thumb: If the user must feel, prove, or experience something—emotionally, legally, or interactively—they will still open the browser.


Looking Ahead: Interfaces & Gateways

This isn’t just faster browsing—it’s a different web. One where search, forms, and tabs fade away, and agents handle the legwork.

In Part 3: Interfaces & Gateways, we’ll explore how UI and system design must evolve to support this new agent-first model, balancing trust, control, and transparency.