Agentic Web Part 2: The Evolution of Web Usage
In Part 1, we defined the Agentic Web: a shift from static pages to outcome-driven interactions powered by AI agents.
Here we dive into how core web use is transforming. Browsing gives way to delegation. The web stops being a place to click and becomes a system that acts.
Web 2.0 Core Use Cases
Stay informed:
Manually visit news sites, RSS, newsletters, search for “what happened?”
Learn & research:
Keyword search ➝ skim multiple sources ➝ bookmark or copy–paste notes
Communicate & build community:
Email, chat apps, social media feeds, forums
Consume entertainment
Stream video/music, play web games, scroll memesDiscover & buy
Search + ad/social referrals ➝ compare offers ➝ fill checkout formsManage money
Log in to online banking, trading dashboards, crypto walletsDo work & create
SaaS dashboards, cloud docs, CMS/blog editorsBook & coordinate services
Flight portals, ride-hailing, food delivery, tele-health portalsSelf-development & education
MOOCs, language apps, digital training platforms
From One-Size-Fits-All to Adaptive Automation
In the early days of AI on the web, interaction was treated as a one-size-fits-all experience: enter a prompt, let the model run, accept the output. But this approach oversimplifies reality. Human behaviour isn’t uniform: it’s contextual, emotionally layered, and risk-sensitive.
Users calibrate trust in AI systems based on the stakes, emotional significance, and potential consequences of each action.
Why Maslow Still Matters in the Agentic Web
To design automation that feels trustworthy, we must align it with Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs:
Physiological Needs – food, shelter, basic goods
Safety Needs – health, financial stability, protection
Belonging & Love – relationships, community, connection
Esteem – status, achievement, personal value
Self-Actualization – growth, creativity, purpose
The further up the pyramid a task falls, the more emotional weight, irreversibility, and regulatory impact it tends to carry. Consequently, the more nuanced and collaborative automation must become.
Trust Calibration: Matching Automation to Human Psychology
Factor | Low-Stakes Tasks | High-Stakes Tasks |
---|---|---|
Cost or Risk | $5 household item, news digest | Designer goods, healthcare, legal matters |
Emotional Weight | “Refill dog food” | “Plan my wedding menu” |
Reversibility | Easily undone (cancel, edit, re-order) | Difficult to unwind (legal filings, medical decisions) |
Regulation | Light or none | Heavily regulated (finance, health, privacy, compliance) |
Key Insight:
Basic-level tasks → full automation
Mid to upper-level tasks → consultative, agent-supported experiences
Autonomy Spectrum for Core Web Use Cases
As we examined not every task on the web requires - or deserves - the same level of oversight. Some can be fully delegated to agents, while others demand active human involvement. The Autonomy Spectrum illustrates how common web use cases divide across three modes of control: Agent-Led (full autonomy), Collaborative (partial autonomy), and User-Led (low autonomy).
Use Case | Agent-Led (Full Autonomy) | Collaborative (Partial Autonomy) | User-Led (Low Autonomy) |
---|---|---|---|
Stay Informed | Daily news digest, sentiment alerts | Curated deep-dive | Op-ed comparison |
Learn & Research | Collect abstracts | Draft literature review | Final thesis |
Communicate | Auto-sort inbox | Suggest talking points | Deliver bad news |
E-Commerce | Restock consumables | Laptop shortlist | One-of-a-kind art |
Finance | Pay utilities | Portfolio rebalance | High-risk investment |
Travel & Logistics | Book commutes | Business trip planning | Honeymoon |
Creative Work | Resize images | First-pass ad copy | Final brand voice |
Security & Compliance | Patch vulnerabilities | Flag unusual logins | Regulatory reports |
The Universal Agentic Workflow Framework
To operate effectively in an outcome-driven, agent-powered web, AI systems must follow a structured approach that mirrors how humans think, act, and adapt. The Universal Agentic Workflow Framework outlines the foundational stages every intelligent agent must execute to deliver reliable, human-aligned results.
# | Phase | What Really Happens | Why It Matters | Signs You’re Doing It Right |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Intent (Query) | An agent extracts the goal the user cares about (“Book me a follow-up appointment with Dr Lewis next Wednesday at 10 a.m.”). Good agents clarify ambiguities (“Which Dr Lewis?”), detect constraints (insurance network, location), and capture desired outcomes (confirmation, reminder). | Precision up front prevents re-work later. Clear intent drives the entire chain; vague intent multiplies error downstream. | • Agent paraphrases the request in plain language for confirmation. • Ambiguities are surfaced as questions, not assumptions. |
2 | Reasoning | The agent decomposes the goal into ordered sub-tasks, checks domain rules, and selects an approach. Example: “Follow-up appointment” → find provider calendar → insurance eligibility → secure-messaging API. | In regulated spaces—health, finance, legal—flawed reasoning equals liability. The agent must reconcile policy, best practices, and user context before acting. | • Decision tree is stored in a log or “show-your-work” view. • Conflicts (e.g., double-booking) are resolved or flagged before proceeding. |
3 | Context Gathering | The agent pulls all needed data: user preferences (morning slots), stored credentials, current inventory (available slots), and compliance limits (HIPAA, GDPR). It may query other agents or databases. | Without comprehensive context, even perfect logic executes on bad inputs. Context turns an abstract plan into a tailored action. | • Data sources and timestamps are recorded. • Sensitive data requests are minimal and justified (“need-to-know”). |
4 | Execution (Tool Calls) | The agent performs tasks via APIs, forms, or RPA: finds open slots, books appointment, updates calendar, sends confirmation. For simple jobs this is milliseconds; for complex chains it may span multiple systems. | Execution is where theory meets reality—latency, API limits, and edge-cases surface. Trust depends on reliably converting intent into a concrete result. | • Each call is atomic and reversible where possible. • Errors trigger retries or rollbacks, not silent failure. |
5 | Reflection | Immediately after acting, the agent checks whether the outcome matches intent (Did the booking succeed? Is the date correct?). It compares state before vs. after and logs discrepancies for learning. | Reflexive self-check catches silent errors, reduces user escalation, and supplies training data for continuous improvement. | • Confirmation artifacts (booking IDs, timestamps) are validated. • Mismatches trigger automated corrective steps or user alerts. |
6 | Human Audit | A human-in-the-loop reviews or approves actions when stakes warrant it: high-cost purchases, clinical decisions, legal filings. Audit depth scales with risk (read-only log for $20 buy; mandatory sign-off for surgery schedule). | Keeps ultimate control with the human, satisfying ethical, legal, and emotional requirements. It also builds user confidence in the agent. | • Clear hand-off: the agent pauses and notifies the user with concise context and options. • Audit trail is immutable and easily exportable. |
7 | Iterative Feedback | Post-action feedback (explicit “Looks good” or implicit correction) is stored, scored, and used to adjust future reasoning and context gathering—tightening the personalization loop. | Continuous learning converts single successes into system-wide accuracy gains, compounding value over time. | • Feedback prompts are lightweight (“👍 / 👎”). • Model updates are version-controlled and traceable. |
Rule of Thumb:
Tighten human checkpoints as cost, irreversibility, or regulation increases.
Deep Dive: E-Commerce at Two Extremes
Household Staples (Toilet Paper)
Intent: “Buy the usual brand, cheapest price, deliver tomorrow.”
Agent Action:
Checks price/coupons
Verifies discounts
Executes payment
User Involvement:
Push notification: “Order placed: $11.20, arrives Tue.”
Why It Works: Low cost, reversible, no emotional weight.
Luxury Apparel (Designer Dress)
Intent: “Find a black cocktail dress, budget €800, deliver before July 10.”
Agent Action:
Curates options with return policies
Flags shipping estimates
User Involvement:
Reviews shortlist
Confirms preference and payment
Why Collaboration Matters: High cost, taste sensitivity, potential return hassle.
Behaviour Shift: From Browsing to Outcomes
We established that web usage is changing from the bottom up. The Agentic Web reframes the question from “Where should I click?” to “What should happen?”. Browsing is the core user behaviour of the current web that is shaken to the bone. Marketers and businesses have tried to take advantage of this "random walk" in order to influence web users. Since we are moving away from clicks to outcomes, a lot of this web activity diminishes. But not all of it. Let's examine.
Behaviours Likely to Fade
As agentic patterns spread, expect the following Web 2.x rituals to become obsolete or radically diminished:
Fading Task | Why It Disappears or Shrinks |
---|---|
Typing search queries and clicking through 10 blue links | Agents gather, rank, and synthesize facts; users receive direct answers or auto-performed actions. |
Hand-comparing prices and coupon codes | Purchasing agents continuously benchmark and buy when target conditions are met. |
Filling repetitive forms (checkout, booking, onboarding) | Agents transmit verified identity and payment tokens via secure APIs. |
Daily email triage for routine items (updates, invoices, logistics) | Pattern-recognition agents auto-sort, draft replies, or resolve issues without surfacing them. |
SEO-driven “listicle” content farms | Thin, low-value content stops attracting traffic as agents bypass it for more actionable, decision-ready information. |
Banner and pre-roll advertising at scale | Agents filter out non-value ads; commerce shifts to intent-driven, API-level offers and revenue-sharing models. |
Manual social cross-posting & scheduling | Content agents generate, localize, A/B-test, and auto-publish across platforms. |
One-size-fits-all learning modules | Adaptive tutors replace static video series, offering personalized learning flows. |
First-level customer support chat trees | Domain-specific agents resolve routine inquiries; human escalation occurs only for novelty, complexity, or emotion. |
Why We’ll Still Load the Site
Even as automation replaces many low-stakes tasks, human users will continue to access traditional websites in key situations—especially when trust, experience, or regulation are involved. These are moments when browsing isn't a chore; it's an essential layer of assurance, discovery, or interaction.
Reason | Examples of When It Matters |
---|---|
Trust and liability | Users want to verify the source of medical advice, legal opinions, or investment guidance—seeking names, credentials, and disclaimers from a canonical web page. |
Immersive or tactile shopping | Virtual try-ons, 3D product demos, and AR showrooms enhance decision-making for apparel, home goods, and cosmetics. |
Community and story | Forums, comment sections, newsletters, and live events create social bonds and ongoing engagement that agents can’t replicate. |
Complex interactivity | Tools like configurators, simulators, dashboards, and games still require responsive, real-time browser-based interfaces. |
Identity and transactions | Secure checkouts, account management portals, and Know Your Customer (KYC) flows remain browser endpoints—especially when users must review or confirm details manually. |
Emotional or milestone decisions | Experiences like planning a wedding, evaluating surgery outcomes, or choosing a school demand deep content, comparison, and visual immersion best delivered via the web. |
Rule of thumb: If the user must feel, prove, or experience something—emotionally, legally, or interactively—they will still open the browser.
Looking Ahead: Interfaces & Gateways
This isn’t just faster browsing—it’s a different web. One where search, forms, and tabs fade away, and agents handle the legwork.
In Part 3: Interfaces & Gateways, we’ll explore how UI and system design must evolve to support this new agent-first model, balancing trust, control, and transparency.